skip navigation
Here's how you know US flag signifying that this is a United States Federal Government website

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

SSL

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • FEC Record: Advisory opinions

AO 2008-08: Earmarked contribution counts against current spending limits

October 1, 2008

An earmarked contribution sent by an individual through a nonconnected political action committee (PAC) is considered “made” when the contributor gives the money to the nonconnected PAC, not when the committee eventually forwards the contribution to the final recipient. Thus, a contribution earmarked through a nonconnected PAC in 2008 will be subject to the 2008 calendar-year contribution limit and count against the contributor’s 2007-2008 biennial limit, even if the contribution is not forwarded to the intended recipient until a later election cycle.

Background

On June 25, 2008, Jonathan Zucker made an on-line credit card contribution through ActBlue, a nonconnected PAC. ActBlue solicits and accepts on-line credit card contributions for candidates and party committees and forwards them to the intended recipient via check. Mr. Zucker earmarked his contribution for the 2010 Democratic nominee for the U.S. Senate in Arizona or, in the event there is no such nominee, to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC).

Usually, a person who receives a contribution of any amount for an authorized political committee, or a contribution greater than $50 for a political committee that is not an authorized committee, must forward the contribution to the intended recipient no later than 10 days after receipt. 11 CFR 102.8(a) and (b)(1), and 110.6(c)(1)(iii) and (iv).

However, in AO 2006-30, the Commission determined that ActBlue could solicit and receive contributions earmarked for a prospective candidate and delay forwarding those contributions until no later than 10 days after the candidate had registered a campaign committee, rather than within 10 days after ActBlue’s receipt of the contribution. The Commission also determined that ActBlue could forward the contribution to a named national party committee in the event the intended candidate did not register with the Commission. See also AO 2003-23.

Analysis

The Federal Election Campaign Act and Commission regulations place limits on the amount that any person can contribute to a national party committee, and this limit is indexed for inflation. For 2008, an individual can give no more than $28,500 to a national party committee. 11 CFR 110.1(c)(1). Individuals are additionally subject to a “biennial limit,” which limits the total amount of contributions that any individual may make to all federal candidates, PACs and party committees during a two-year cycle. For the 2008 cycle, the overall biennial limit is $108,200, which is further broken down into separate limits for candidates and other committees. The biennial limit is also indexed for inflation every two years. 11 CFR 110.1(b)(1)(ii). Inflation adjustments beyond 2008 cannot be determined at this time.

The date a contribution is “made” determines the election limit it counts against, and a contribution is considered “made” when the contributor relinquishes control over it. 11 CFR 110.1(b)(6). A credit card contribution is “made” when the credit card or number is presented because, at that point, the contributor is strictly obligated to make the payment. AO 1990-14.

In this case, Mr. Zucker’s credit card has been charged for the contribution, and he is obligated to pay that amount to the credit card company. Thus, his contribution has been “made.” Moreover, under Commission regulations a contribution to a candidate or committee with respect to a particular election, including an earmarked contribution, counts against the contribution limits in effect during the election cycle in which the contribution is actually made, regardless of the year in which the particular election is held. 11 CFR 110.5(c)(1). Accordingly, if his contribution is forwarded to a 2010 Senate nominee, it will still count against his 2007-2008 biennial limit. If there is no Democratic Senate nominee and his contribution is forwarded to the DSCC, the contribution will again count against his 2007-2008 biennial limit and against his calendar-year contribution limit to the DSCC for 2008.

The Commission further determined that, because Mr. Zucker may not know until 2010 whether his contribution was forwarded to a candidate or a political committee, the only way to ensure that he does not exceed any possible limit that may apply is to consider his contribution as if it were made to both the 2010 Democratic Senate nominee and the DSCC.

Date Issued: September 12, 2008; Length: 4 pages.

  • Author 
    • Isaac Baker
    • Communications Specialist